But the site says immediate family members are exempt from restrictions and extended family members can travel with an Authorization letter. So confusing
But the site says immediate family members are exempt from restrictions and extended family members can travel with an Authorization letter. So confusing
Yeah, this case falls a bit between the definitions they are using (i.e. the extended family exemption/authorisation process seems to have been thought up for visitor visa cases).
My suggestion for the poster with COPR/copr-visa would be to apply for an authorisation letter using the existing copr/visa on the basis of the extended family exemption. Don't know if they will do that, but worth a try.
(That said trying to do these things over webform is annoying, the categories the web form puts are not at all clear)
My mother is in Canada as a PR. So i think i am an extended family member being a non-dependent child. When i raised webform along with Imm06 statutory declaration form, the reply came after 12 days that they cannot find enough evidence of being an extended family member. Strange. I have added all the documents like my passport with my mom's name on it, my mom's passport her PR card other docs. Not sure what more they are expecting.
Ok so they did NOT say COPR holders are not eligible for this exception. All they said was they are not convinced with the relationship proof. Which looks odd with the documented proof mentioned. hmmm
A visa is a Visa... PRV or Visitors visa. The travel restrictions are not only for CoPR holders. Right now one can't travel to Canada for holidays even with the visitor's Visa except you are exempt from travel restrictions. Besides I know of 2 families that got their CoPR and PRV in August and the other in November that travelled in December and January and were not asked for authorization, Just asked for negative Covid test, ArriveCAN, Proof of quarantine plan, passport, CoPR..... That being said it's risky to travel now because you "might' be turned back. No guarantees.
Ok so they did NOT say COPR holders are not eligible for this exception. All they said was they are not convinced with the relationship proof. Which looks odd with the documented proof mentioned. hmmm