Bill C-6: Senate stage

[admontreal]

Dear they are absolutely right, let them introduce new bill for 3/5 and days before pr

That Bill would not address some very symbolic and dangerous issues created by C-24.

 

[admontreal]

so it will have to be cancelled and redrafted under a new bill.

Why ? All you are seeing is a standard procedure. The bill will pass as is or with additional amendments on the Due process for revocation. The government will never allow to be told what to do by a bunch of un-elected w*nkers ...

 

[disha_kaur]

I am confused after reading your posts...
Can someone explain again what was discussed today please?

 

[marcher]

Why ? All you are seeing is a standard procedure. The bill will pass as is or with additional amendments on the Due process for revocation. The government will never allow to be told what to do by a bunch of un-elected w*nkers ...

I do not know what will happen, but just a suggestion might be providing a detailed definition of who is a terrorist to avoid applying to the term to anyone who the government does not like in the future.

 

[asifmehmood]

going to committee! wow

 

[tyl92]

C6 referred to committee

 

[hmirzaei]

Second reading is passed! Sent to the committee! am I right?

 

[monalisa]

well done, finished 2nd reading, i told you media plays a big role ;D 8)

 

[rasmy]

Refered to the senate commitee.

 

[disha_kaur]

positive news after long!!

 

[marcher]

Second reading is passed! Sent to the committee! am I right?

Correct. So we can expect a vote when they return from the holidays.

 

[hmirzaei]

Correct. So we can expect a vote when they return from the holidays.

Do they have to still discuss in the third reading? Can they adjourn again or do they simply vote?

 

[monalisa]

Correct. So we can expect a vote when they return from the holidays.

hope so, hope they will not delay in committee as in bill c29 i think they done 6 settings

 

[ahasan]

Is it sent to Social Affairs, Science and Technology committee, where Omidvar is not a member?

 

[marcher]

Do they have to still discuss in the third reading? Can they adjourn again or do they simply vote?

I think at committee level it is going straight to votes. Someone correct me please if I am wrong.

I hate to be the party pooper every time; but what happened so far is a progress, not good or bad news. No need to get excited, because committee stage could end the lifetime of this bill; or maybe approve it. The point is we will finally know what the voting senators really think. Most of them kept quiet throughout the process.