Nope, because the family numbers are in a separate quota. According to 2017 Report, there will be arround 84,000 additional family members. Take a look at 2017 report.
Nope, because the family numbers are in a separate quota. According to 2017 Report, there will be arround 84,000 additional family members. Take a look at 2017 report.
Nope, because the family numbers are in a separate quota. According to 2017 Report, there will be arround 84,000 additional family members. Take a look at 2017 report.
I honestly dont know anymore what I was trying to say. Nevermind, this is the LINK http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/media/notices/2016-10-31.asp we should look into, and here it says 172,500 economic total. Family total 84,000. Refugees total 40,000. Humanitarian 3,500.
All together 300,000.
I am particularly interested in FSW+CEC+FST and the target here is 73,700 (through EE)
AND I quote
moelaghil said:
Therefore:
For FSW+CEC+FST the number of ITA per month should be 73,700/(12*1.5) = 4094
For PNP the number of ITA per month should be 30600/(12*1.5) = 1700
So I would expect the number of draws to be twice a month with roughly 2900 ITA.
I think this ramp up is temporary in order to catch up on lost time. They were working hard at the last half of 2016 to clear pre EE backlog. I expect that the applications then required far more processing and therefore time consuming. So they are behind on their quota for 2017, but with the rate they are going I expect them to catch up pretty quickly.
My prediction is 459 and nearly 3100 invites. If you see 2016 draw pattern, they initially lowered the score and gradually increased to 480-500 points. I am seeing previous year draw in CIC site. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/mi/ita.asp
My prediction is 459 and nearly 3100 invites. If you see 2016 draw pattern, they initially lowered the score and gradually increased to 480-500 points. I am seeing previous year draw in CIC site. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/mi/ita.asp
Which would be the logical thing to assume, except you can't compare apples to oranges really. We have new rules now, 600 points from LMIAs are history plus last year the numbers were greatly decreased due to the refugee problem
Sure but I don't have experience on IELTS so I won't be able to provide a comparison.
Celpip itself is not hard at all, but for me, writing is the only challenge to get to CLB9 or higher. The entire test is done using computer including the speaking part. I prepared for it by purchasing online sample test and the free online samples, too.
Overall it's pretty easy to score CLB8 but for CLB9 or max you will probably need more than one try and extra study.
I appeared for IELTS and scored CLB 10 in Speaking and listening and CLB 9 in Reading, but Writing has screwed me up real bad.
That is the reason I wanted to try CELPIP, to begin with my handwriting is even worst then doctors (NO offence to any Doctor) and then I have been working on Computers for very long, probably a negative side of working in IT no more writing on papers .... ;-)
My prediction is 459 and nearly 3100 invites. If you see 2016 draw pattern, they initially lowered the score and gradually increased to 480-500 points. I am seeing previous year draw in CIC site. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/mi/ita.asp
Doesn't additional family members mean sponsorships for spouse, parents etc.
I think the ones that are part of ITA are separate.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
My prediction is 459 and nearly 3100 invites. If you see 2016 draw pattern, they initially lowered the score and gradually increased to 480-500 points. I am seeing previous year draw in CIC site. http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/mi/ita.asp
