This doesn't look like a TRV application. It looks like a spousal sponsorship application. Is that what it is? If so, you really need to be posting your questions in the Family Sponsorship section of the forum.
This doesn't look like a TRV application. It looks like a spousal sponsorship application. Is that what it is? If so, you really need to be posting your questions in the Family Sponsorship section of the forum.
Your in-laws had not declared the US deportation for four consecutive Canada visa applications. Although IRCC does not condone such oversight for even a single application, your in-laws ignored the good advice given by you to declare the US deportation. They will now have to pay a huge price for their mistakes.
Their previous TRV applications were not refused for non-declaration of the US deportation. IRCC would have likely banned them if it was discovered for their first applications.
Your in-laws cannot take the 'I did not see this visa refusal question' approach. It will not work.
No, their super visas will not be granted. At best they can expect another visa refusal (super visas) but because they concealed the US deportation (intentionally or unintentionally), they will most likely be banned.
This misrepresentation ban will severely affect their chances of getting visas to other visa-required countries
The same thing happen to me back in 2016. I applied for visitor visa and forgot to mention about USA refusal. However I sent them a letter stating it was honest mistake and i didn't meant to do any cheating. And after 1 month i got the approval.
So its better if you can just right a good letter and explain your self.
The same thing happen to me back in 2016. I applied for visitor visa and forgot to mention about USA refusal. However I sent them a letter stating it was honest mistake and i didn't meant to do any cheating. And after 1 month i got the approval.
So its better if you can just right a good letter and explain your self.
The question asks clearly "have you been refused a visa to Canada or any other country" - why did you think the USA wasn't needed? You had to fill out every form and question asked of you, you don't get to decide what is needed or not.
You must respond by telling the visa officer why you didn't declare the visa refusal and any other information you didn't provide. Then you need to hope your visa is only refused, and that you're not banned for five years.
The reasons for refusal are not false, you just don't agree with them.
The question asks clearly "have you been refused a visa to Canada or any other country" - why did you think the USA wasn't needed? You had to fill out every form and question asked of you, you don't get to decide what is needed or not.
You must respond by telling the visa officer why you didn't declare the visa refusal and any other information you didn't provide. Then you need to hope your visa is only refused, and that you're not banned for five years.
The reasons for refusal are not false, you just don't agree with them.
The question asks clearly "have you been refused a visa to Canada or any other country" - why did you think the USA wasn't needed? You had to fill out every form and question asked of you, you don't get to decide what is needed or not.
You must respond by telling the visa officer why you didn't declare the visa refusal and any other information you didn't provide. Then you need to hope your visa is only refused, and that you're not banned for five years.
The reasons for refusal are not false, you just don't agree with them.
Why did you not declare them in the application when you were asked if you have ever been refused a visa to Canada or any other country? What reasons do you have for not answering the questions correctly?
Why did you not declare them in the application when you were asked if you have ever been refused a visa to Canada or any other country? What reasons do you have for not answering the questions correctly?