>>>>>>>NOVEMBER 2019 AOR<<<<<<< Join here

[Daljeet1]

If all your documents are good, you need not worry. IRCC will verify, and if required contact you for clarification.

It could also be that your application may have been randomly picked for quality check.

Just because they are doing check on misrepresentation does not mean that I will be rejected right?

 

[legalfalcon]

Just because they are doing check on misrepresentation does not mean that I will be rejected right?

No, if they have any concerns, IRCC has to give you an opportunity to give your side. See https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...als/service-delivery/procedural-fairness.html

The above link lists the procedural fairness rights you have under the administrative law.

 

[Daljeet1]

Thnx

No, if they have any concerns, IRCC has to give you an opportunity to give your side. See https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...als/service-delivery/procedural-fairness.html

The above link lists the procedural fairness rights you have under the administrative law.

Thanks for the info

 

[Mike@2019]

@legalfalcon Hi. I received latest gcms notes which states Misrepresentation :1 and status says: Not Started and is assigned to someone else for verification. Is this routind check or does this mean, something triggered to be misrepresentation and they are trying tk verify?

What does your eligibility say under the ASSESSMENT in page 2?

 

[Daljeet1]

What does your eligibility say under the ASSESSMENT in page 2?

Recommend Interview

 

[Mike@2019]

Nothing to worry, they're probably verifying your information.
Usually you you tell why an interview has been recommended from the notes (if it's not redacted)
Begin with the notes from the Program Assistant. Then the notes from the case analyst or case processing agent. Then the notes from the Officer. Most likely the Officer's notes will be redacted.
Somewhere within those notes you'll find the answer.

 

[Daljeet1]

Nothing to worry, they're probably verifying your information.
Usually you you tell why an interview has been recommended from the notes (if it's not redacted)
Begin with the notes from the Program Assistant. Then the notes from the case analyst or case processing agent. Then the notes from the Officer. Most likely the Officer's notes will be redacted.
Somewhere within those notes you'll find the answer.

Case processing agent notes are all good it says everything met and ready to finalize. But I claimed points for 5 yrs, 3 yrs for 1 noc and 2 yrs for another noc but agent considered only 2 yrs exp and revised the other one not sure why. Anyhow the points are still met, and officer notes are redacted. I had 4 SP refusals but I gave details of only one because I did not had any concrete details. However, last week I attached one refusal letter and informed that I had 4 refusals but dont know the details of rest 3 as I lost their letters and hence I am attaching the only lettee I have and hope this will help you to find other 3 details.

 

[Mike@2019]

Case processing agent notes are all good it says everything met and ready to finalize. But I claimed points for 5 yrs, 3 yrs for 1 noc and 2 yrs for another noc but agent considered only 2 yrs exp and revised the other one not sure why. Anyhow the points are still met, and officer notes are redacted. I had 4 SP refusals but I gave details of only one because I did not had any concrete details. However, last week I attached one refusal letter and informed that I had 4 refusals but dont know the details of rest 3 as I lost their letters and hence I am attaching the only lettee I have and hope this will help you to find other 3 details.

OK.
Was the 5 years in one company or 3 years for one and 2 years for another? And was this employment in Canada?

As for the refusals, I think you have done all you could do, and sending the documents afterwards might help your case.

 

[Daljeet1]

OK.
Was the 5 years in one company or 3 years for one and 2 years for another? And was this employment in Canada?

As for the refusals, I think you have done all you could do, and sending the documents afterwards might help your case.

In same company 5 yrs now 6 yrs

 

[Mike@2019]

In same company 5 yrs now 6 yrs

Outside Canada I suppose. Which is your visa office?
Anyway don't stress about it. You will not be refused without a PFL.

 

[Daljeet1]

Outside Canada I suppose. Which is your visa office?
Anyway don't stress about it. You will not be refused without a PFL.

Yeah outlander. VO is Delhi.

 

[legalfalcon]

Nothing to worry, they're probably verifying your information.
Usually you you tell why an interview has been recommended from the notes (if it's not redacted)
Begin with the notes from the Program Assistant. Then the notes from the case analyst or case processing agent. Then the notes from the Officer. Most likely the Officer's notes will be redacted.
Somewhere within those notes you'll find the answer.

The reason for the interview is never disclosed in the notes. As that vitiates the entire purpose of the interview and takes the surprise element away. For all applicants, who have an interview scheduled, will also have the relevant note redacted.

However, subsequently after the interview, the note may be released on a case by basis if you request another GCMS notes.

 

[Mike@2019]

OK.

The reason for the interview is never disclosed in the notes. As that vitiates the entire purpose of the interview and takes the surprise element away. For all applicants, who have an interview scheduled, will also have the relevant note redacted.

However, subsequently after the interview, the note may be released on a case by basis if you request another GCMS notes.

OK.

 

[caipsnotes]

OK.

OK.

Here is some more info on interviews;

The purpose of the interview is to gather information to make a decision on the application. An interview may only be required if there are concerns related to eligibility or admissibility for the application.

Officers conduct interviews with applicants to:

• ensure that information submitted on the application is truthful and complete;
• detect and deter fraud;
• clarify specific information;
• conduct quality control;
• give counselling;
• provide applicants with an opportunity to respond to concerns regarding elements of the application;
• assess knowledge and language;
• check health and security grounds;
• inform applicants about decisions.

Conducting interviews describes the steps that should be followed when conducting interviews

 

[KoKo_]

"The federal government will extend the Canada-U.S. land border closure for another 30 days until Sept. 21, Public Safety Minister Bill Blair said Friday."
source: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canada-us-border-closure-september-21-1.5686475
Great...for the fifth time....Happy New Year everyone