If you got rejected? Yup, you would lose part of what you paid, and if they figure you misrepresented, you could get banned from applying for a number of years. I'd wait till August.
Yeah, I know, in many ways it's a really faulty system. In this case, it's almost like a trap for you! But again, I'm not an expert. Just my knowledge from reading the threads I linked to you. But if I were you I'd definitely apply in August with a new ITA.
Yeah, I know, in many ways it's a really faulty system. In this case, it's almost like a trap for you! But again, I'm not an expert. Just my knowledge from reading the threads I linked to you. But if I were you I'd definitely apply in August with a new ITA.
The status since then is "your application is in progress. We will a message once we start the background check".
Which stage is this ? IP1?
and should I order GCMS notes ?
Any other action i can take at the moment ?
The status since then is "your application is in progress. We will a message once we start the background check".
Which stage is this ? IP1?
and should I order GCMS notes ?
Any other action i can take at the moment ?
The status since then is "your application is in progress. We will a message once we start the background check".
Which stage is this ? IP1?
and should I order GCMS notes ?
Any other action i can take at the moment ?
5 to 8 now on immi-tracker with Inland and USA residents still dominating the success rate so far for June submissions. Hope outland (non USA) start getting some traction soon.
5 to 8 now on immi-tracker with Inland and USA residents still dominating the success rate so far for June submissions. Hope outland (non USA) start getting some traction soon.
Yeah, I know, in many ways it's a really faulty system. In this case, it's almost like a trap for you! But again, I'm not an expert. Just my knowledge from reading the threads I linked to you. But if I were you I'd definitely apply in August with a new ITA.
Section 11.2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) includes a new authority that supports the Express Entry system.
Under section A11.2, an officer may not issue a visa to an applicant who did not or does not meet the Express Entry minimum entry criteria (MEC) or did not or does not possess the qualifications for which they received their CRS score at the time when
the invitation to apply (ITA) was issued; or
the e-APR was received by IRCC.
When reviewing an application, processing offices must determine if
the applicant possesses the qualifications that they declared in their e-APR, as corroborated by the applicant’s supporting documentation; and
when the applicant submits their e-APR, the information provided in their Express Entry profile has not materially changed to the degree that the applicant would not have been issued an ITA in that round of invitations.
Accordingly, officers should refuse an application under section A11.2 if it is determined that
at the time of the ITA or e-APR, the applicant did not or does not meet the MEC, which includes the requirements of the program to which they were invited to apply; or
Cool!! Good to see something from IRCC, now we can determine what to do with factual information. I'm concerned about this part:
at the time of the ITA or e-APR, the applicant did not or does not meet the MEC, which includes the requirements of the program to which they were invited to apply; or
Did you meet the minimum requirement for CEC at the time when you received your ITA?
Cool!! Good to see something from IRCC, now we can determine what to do with factual information. I'm concerned about this part:
at the time of the ITA or e-APR, the applicant did not or does not meet the MEC, which includes the requirements of the program to which they were invited to apply; or
Did you meet the minimum requirement for CEC at the time when you received your ITA?
if i look in that way literally then i am not suppose to score points for 1 year under CEC . but then again i never entered the points, one fine day they adjusted my score, so if CIC decided to award me the points, i must assume they feel i should , Right.
and if you look carefully once my date crosses the 31st of july, i will officially complete 1 year. and if i pay n submit after 31st of july , basically i match with their statement.. ie "the e-APR was received by IRCC."
if i look in that way literally then i am not suppose to score points for 1 year under CEC . but then again i never entered the points, one fine day they adjusted my score, so if CIC decided to award me the points, i must assume they feel i should , Right.
and if you look carefully once my date crosses the 31st of july, i will officially complete 1 year. and if i pay n submit after 31st of july , basically i match with their statement.. ie "the e-APR was received by IRCC."
Yeah, I see what you mean. But a strict CIC officer may say that you didn't meet minimum requirement at time of ITA. A less strict one might say that it was awarded automatically and you applied after you had done the one year of experience. I'd do it the safe way in August if it were me! But it's not, it's up to you