1- How long did it take for the file to re-open?
2- How long did they take to process it?
3- Why did you chose to re-open? was it giving you better chances?
Also, can you please provide me your rep's number / name.
1- How long did it take for the file to re-open?
2- How long did they take to process it?
3- Why did you chose to re-open? was it giving you better chances?
Also, can you please provide me your rep's number / name.
parents visitor visa without my bank statement, is that possible
Hello there, i am new here. I am dying to invite my parents, i have all the papers and documents that immigrations needs (my t4, NOA, letter from letter and even their return flight and three months medical insurance), but I dont have enough money to put into my bank account to show to the immigration. Probably I only have like two thousand in my account. Please help me! Should I continue to apply them?
Do I really need or my partner needs to show our bank statement.
The officers got some info wrong and it can easily be explained in a re-opening. I would like to know all the options. Unfortunately, there are no statistics so either ways might be good to take but I would like to know all the options and other's experiences.
This is not that rare on TRV applications. What we usually suggest is to just file a new application adding this information to the explanation letter (and any other relevant support documentation). This is way smoother and faster than going through an appeal process and has much more rate of success that trying to show CIC made a mistake.
The only benefit of having CIC "reconsider" is that you won't have to answer yes when asked "have you ever been refused a visa?".... which can be easily explained by "yes, not enough support documentation, but granted after second submission" and get on with your life.
This is not that rare on TRV applications. What we usually suggest is to just file a new application adding this information to the explanation letter (and any other relevant support documentation). This is way smoother and faster than going through an appeal process and has much more rate of success that trying to show CIC made a mistake.
The only benefit of having CIC "reconsider" is that you won't have to answer yes when asked "have you ever been refused a visa?".... which can be easily explained by "yes, not enough support documentation, but granted after second submission" and get on with your life.
All said are good reasons. I am wondering thought that by re-filing I take away the chance to ask to re-consider when they clearly made a mistake. Of course another officer can come up with a different which they happen to do all the time per this forum. I am considering refilling but I would like to know the time lines and for interest of everyone here it would be nice to know that approach as well. I would like to know if anyone can share their experience?