You seem to be the kind that despite all the evidence and words written in law and new regulations presented to you, you still think the sky is purple.
I still see just personal opinions about me, without any prove that I am wrong.
Did you read that I am not ignoring the keeping residency requirement valid until the oath, which is a solid reason for rejection.
If the person manage to maintain his residency by staying here at least 6 months in a calendar year, and the rest of the time is abroad, there is no reason for him to worry about the moral value clause because the residency is there and it is still valid.
But at the same time the majority of time is spend abroad.
There is no direct implementation for rejection in that case based on moral value clauses.
I still see just personal opinions about me, without any prove that I am wrong.
Did you read that I am not ignoring the keeping residency requirement valid until the oath, which is a solid reason for rejection.
If the person manage to maintain his residency by staying here at least 6 months in a calendar year, and the rest of the time is abroad, there is no reason for him to worry about the moral value clause because the residency is there and it is still valid.
But at the same time the majority of time is spend abroad.
There is no direct implementation for rejection in that case based on moral value clauses.
I am done having a conversation with you, regardless whether you think the laws are only moral purposes only. There's no point. Only time will tell when it gets fully implemented and CiC can then confirm your flawed interpretation or not.
There is no "moral clauses", only rules and regulations to apply for citizenship. Nothing else. If Canada want to have moral clauses put in the law, that is what church laws are for.
Sorry, until CIC makes an official public announcement, I won't take the call centre agent's word on the cut off date. Until then it is assumed to be sometime in June / July. So apply under the old rules while you still can, regardless of when the official date kick in.
I don't remember which people already mentioned somewhere in the back of this thread , but today I was also told from an call agent that the intend to reside clause is already effective from 1 Jan 2015.
Maybe soon there will be official announcement regarding that.
I don't remember which people already mentioned somewhere in the back of this thread , but today I was also told from an call agent that the intend to reside clause is already effective from 1 Jan 2015.
Maybe soon there will be official announcement regarding that.
From what I understand is "We would need to declare and sign our intent as per c-24". Since they haven't updated any thing on the forms or documents yet, i dont think its in effect.
Maybe they will ask the applicants to sign and send that application during the process latter on, if there will be something to sign like a hard copy application
