It's sad and scary. It's mentioned in the IRCC website that both MEC and CRS should meet. Unless the cut-off CRS at ITA is met a candidate might be in the pool but the ITA is not justified.
However, don't lose hope. See what your lawyer and other experts say about it. Also discuss with them if this can possibly be considered as a 'misrepresentation' by IRCC and what your strategy should be in such a situation. Keep us posted about your situation. Wish you success and all the very best.
It's sad and scary. It's mentioned in the IRCC website that both MEC and CRS should meet. Unless the cut-off CRS at ITA is met a candidate might be in the pool but the ITA is not justified. It appears that 'MI2' means criteria set by a particular set of 'Ministerial Instructions' based on which your application will be reviewed and decision made.
However, don't lose hope. See what your lawyer and other experts say about it. Also discuss with them if this can possibly be considered as a 'misrepresentation' by IRCC and what your strategy should be in such a situation. Keep us posted about your situation. Wish you success and all the very best.
My question is why is it taking all that time if it's a refusal ? actually my CRS is bellow the min required for the ITAc by -14, my only hope is that might be french primary language can support otherwise there's no issue. I clrearly explained the confusion by email to CPC Ottawa as my case is there actually but honestly im disapointed
My question is why is it taking all that time if it's a refusal ? actually my CRS is bellow the min required for the ITAc by -14, my only hope is that might be french primary language can support otherwise there's no issue. I clrearly explained the confusion by email to CPC Ottawa as my case is there actually but honestly im disapointed