Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AdUnit Name: [Header]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250],[970,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Immigration to Canada, subForumSection: Family Class Sponsorship
AdUnit Name: [ForumThreadViewRightGutter]
Enabled: [Yes],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[300,250],[300,600]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumThreadViewRightGutter],
forumSection: Immigration to Canada, subForumSection: Family Class Sponsorship
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
AdUnit Name: [AboveMainContent]
Enabled: [Yes],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[970,250],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Immigration to Canada, subForumSection: Family Class Sponsorship
I posted a link to an article on a lawyer's website stating that the Adjudication can make a person inadmissible to Canada, which could also mean that a PR application could be denied. YOU posted the ENF2 information that shows this to be incorrect.
How does that not make sense? If ENF2 is correct, how can the lawyer's article also be correct?
I'm only showing what people already know; getting different answers to the same question is common, even among those that should know (lawyer vs CIC).
I posted a link to an article on a lawyer's website stating that the Adjudication can make a person inadmissible to Canada, which could also mean that a PR application could be denied. YOU posted the ENF2 information that shows this to be incorrect.
How does that not make sense? If ENF2 is correct, how can the lawyer's article also be correct?
I'm only showing what people already know; getting different answers to the same question is common, even among those that should know (lawyer vs CIC).
I have a dui in Delaware that was dismissed through that states deferred adjudication program. I do one year of probation and completed an MADD panel meeting, and alcohol treatement within this year of probation (judges orders). After completing all of this my DUI was DISMISSED. I have been to Canada at least 20 times in the past year if this means anything. I am assuming they would've picked up on this by now if it was going to be an issue.
I am ask goibg to add , that I had my FBI background check done just so I would know what is it it ahead of time before I applied to Have my husband sponsor me for PR. My FBI background check and back TOTALLY CLEAN. The DUI is not on it and either is anything else. It is 100% clean.
I also have a legal opinion from a Canadian immigration lawyer stating why I am admissible to Canada.
AdUnit Name: [BelowMainContent]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Immigration to Canada, subForumSection: Family Class Sponsorship
AdUnit Name: [Footer]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Immigration to Canada, subForumSection: Family Class Sponsorship