AdUnit Name: [Header ]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250],[970,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship
AdUnit Name: [ForumThreadViewRightGutter ]
Enabled: [Yes],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[300,250],[300,600]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumThreadViewRightGutter],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser .
AdUnit Name: [AboveMainContent ]
Enabled: [Yes],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[970,250],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship
artin2015 said:
How about protect person before get PR ? Is count a half day for them ?
Protected persons get zero credit for Pre-PR time spent.
I think this category is effected most by Bill C-24:
- The processing time for PR application under this category is 2 years.
- Lets say IF everything goes well they get PR in 2 years.
- then wait another 4 years to apply for citizenship
So overall it takes around 7+ years
Joshua1 said:
Semantics!
A bicycle and a truck are both considered vehicles as it pertains to traffic but we all know they are different
And they both (workers/visitors/students), however different, follow the same rules of the road (temporary residents of canada).
screech339 said:
And they both (workers/visitors/students), however different, follow the same rules of the road (temporary residents of canada).
Do they? Workers can work while visitors cannot, which is a pretty large rule difference.
Your analogy is also poor because bicycles don't need a license while trucks do, which is a VERY BIG rule difference for obvious reasons
Any idea when C6 is scheduled for debate today.
OK, stop, just stop! Can everyone PLEASE stop turning this thread into a contest and focus on the original intent of the thread??!!
Thanks in advance! *sigh*
screech339 said:
And they both (workers/visitors/students), however different, follow the same rules of the road (temporary residents of canada).
You are too literal to hold a discussion with. Applicants don't make rule. The government of Canada make the rules. So, if you want to be upset, enjoy!
I have no issues with using pre-PR credit so long as it is appropriately applied to the proper stream. I personally believe pre-PR credit should counts toward PR qualifications. This makes the more sense to me. The more you stay as temporary resident, the more qualified you are for PR status. Pre-PR credit should not be applied to citizenship as that is jumping the gun, sort of speak. Pre-PR credit towards PR qualifications, PR time credits towards citizenship makes the more appropriate and logical sense. But hey, that's me.
C6 started. New amendment being proposed on behalf of Sen. Eaton ... listening to what it is
C4 passed senate with amendments
it's about 4/6 instead of 3/5
oh this woman is killing the bill....
what did she propose for the amendment?
She is increasing it to 5 years now???
Guys!!
Email, call independent senators not to change core of government bill C6
NOW. You got 1 day!!
the amendment wants to keep c24 4/6 rule as is!
AdUnit Name: [BelowMainContent ]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship
AdUnit Name: [Footer ]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship