So, you basically refuse to abide by the facts-only rule of this thread and consider that link to be the only one stating facts, which is why you refuse to not debate and speculate on this thread.
1 word: Wow.
As a lawyer would say: No further question Your Honour.
So, you basically refuse to abide by the facts-only rule of this thread and consider that link to be the only one stating facts, which is why you refuse to not debate and speculate on this thread.
1 word: Wow.
As a lawyer would say: No further question Your Honour.
8) ???
This is not the case your highness , he/she a bit annoyed me when said " you're wrong", that was could be said nicer. However, I respect and further like the intent of this thread being for facts ONLY although I'm not the one who started speculating if you look at the history of the posts!
BTW, This is my last post here for NON-facts interventions!!
Just fyi: I won't be able to listen in to the debate today. Got other obligations. I will have a look at the Senate Journal tonight and can then update you on what I read there.
March 8, 2017—Resuming debate on the motion of the Honourable Senator Omidvar, seconded by the Honourable Senator Gagné, for the third reading of Bill C-6, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act, as amended.