April 2018 AOR - join here

[cansha]

CEC inland

Called cic today and agent told eligibility status is "Review Required" as of June 7th.
No update after that. He was not sure about the reason for reviwr required.

Yes did that today.
Is that bad, because I have seen it as a normal process for most of the cases to eligibility being reviewed by a senior agent.

We will know more from your GCMS notes.

 

[Pomo6]

Hi guys,
My application is CEC express Entry.

My AOR date is April 19, 2018
Status was NA for a week
Received Additional Doc request (Schedule A) on Apr 25 - I submitted same day
Medicals passed the next day Apr 26
The status is still 'In process'.

Any idea whether I am in IP1 or IP2?

P.S: I have crossed 6 months mark today without any update

Thanks

 

[bimale4bipeople]

Hi guys,
My application is CEC express Entry.

My AOR date is April 19, 2018
Status was NA for a week
Received Additional Doc request (Schedule A) on Apr 25 - I submitted same day
Medicals passed the next day Apr 26
The status is still 'In process'.

Any idea whether I am in IP1 or IP2?

P.S: I have crossed 6 months mark today without any update

Thanks

Since you are in Canada, order GCMS notes from this website(for free): https://atip-aiprp.apps.gc.ca/atip/
It will take 30 days for them to email you. These notes will help you understand what is going on with your application.

 

[jayson_mires]

I also applied via an agent. And basically saying the same thing. That it is taking time.

But of course doesnt help how you feel, when you see so many others getting within the stipulated 6 months, and you dont.

 

[jayson_mires]

How many of your VO is Sydney Nova Scotia (That is those from April who are yet to get PPR)

 

[Deep1691]

How many of your VO is Sydney Nova Scotia (That is those from April who are yet to get PPR)

My application is under review and is lying in centralized intake office (which is also Sydney NS) for last 3 months.

 

[anand4udel]

Mine is in CIO for 5 month..AOR - 3rd April.

 

[anand4udel]

Just a quick update on my profile.
FSW-O, Hitting 6 month mark in 7 Days. Eligibility still under review for job duties.
No update in the past 5 months.

Same for me.

 

[waterlooengineer]

If you have your GCMS notes, check what does your ACTIVITY 1-5 is mentioning..

Notes as of July 24th, 2018:

Security is blank with s.21 on the top right.

Activity 1
Criminality passed.

Activity 2,3,4 and 5 are blank.

 

[bimale4bipeople]

Notes as of July 24th, 2018:

Security is blank with s.21 on the top right.

Activity 1
Criminality passed.

Activity 2,3,4 and 5 are blank.

Does your ACTIVITY 6 mention Security ?
I suggest you order CBSA notes from the same ATIP website

 

[cherti]

Does any have agent code PK03896 in your GCMS notes ?

 

[waterlooengineer]

Does your ACTIVITY 6 mention Security ?
I suggest you order CBSA notes from the same ATIP website

Yes Activity 6 is Security - blank

I will be ordering cbsa notes soon.

 

[Rijo02]

If an applicants security check have not started (according to GCMS) but some pages were redacted. Does it imply SS? And I have also read that if an applicant with dependent did not include the spouses authorization when the GCMS was ordered, that some of the spouses information will be redacted. Can you guys explain: @bimale4bipeople, Montreal coordinator, @cansha ,etc please respond. Thanks!!!

 

[cansha]

If an applicants security check have not started (according to GCMS) but some pages were redacted. Does it imply SS? And I have also read that if an applicant with dependent did not include the spouses authorization when the GCMS was ordered, that some of the spouses information will be redacted. Can you guys explain: @bimale4bipeople, Montreal coordinator, @cansha ,etc please respond. Thanks!!!

@bimale4bipeople is a better person to comment on this. Based on his previous post, your case did appear to me as a case of SS but I'm not sure if not providing signature for spouse may cause some information to be redacted.

 

[bimale4bipeople]

@bimale4bipeople is a better person to comment on this. Based on his previous post, your case did appear to me as a case of SS but I'm not sure if not providing signature for spouse may cause some information to be redacted.

I am in SS