@bimale4bipeople , @Toronto2018 , @tbn2k18 ... i think u all r at the similar stages as all have been recommended passed but pending for the final reviews... everyone is close to ppr one aftr the other..
from what ive researched from the notes. went through around 100 pages of the 'understanding GCMS notes' thread
IP1 date is the date the 'program assistant' at CIO starts reviewing for r10 completeness check (this matches with the gcms notes date for note 3), eligibility is also reviewed by a case analyst (note 4) and is recommended passed. once case analyst recommends passed then it is assigned to final review by an officer (assigned to field in GCMS).
IP2 date is the date the officer at CPC or LVO starts the final review of eligibility(note 1) and criminality and security.
umm, confusing. IRCC call centre told me eligibility under processing on Monday and due date on my file was 13/06. @legalfalcon never gives importance to due dates if you read his posts.
umm, confusing. IRCC call centre told me eligibility under processing on Monday and due date on my file was 13/06. @legalfalcon never gives importance to due dates if you read his posts.
I think I will go for CBSA notes. I am waiting for the feedback from @legalfalcon and @DelPiero07 whether I am in some sort of black hole of security screening or not...
Can someone please help me understand which office did the application go to and why the delay. I find everything is in order. They have worked on the file in April and Last update was 13 June.
My timelines (94 days and waiting)
AOR: 11-APR-2018
NA1: 11-APR-2018
MEP: 18-APR-2018
IP1: 18-APR-2018
IP2: 28-JUN-2018
No expert here but your notes look good. I would be happy if I were you. What is the difference between eligibility “recommended passed” vs “passed”? Does it change to “passed” when the file gets verified by a senior officer as @navinball was referring to?
As promised, here are the other relevant parts of the notes. Any feedback is more than welcome (I was actually wondering if I should raise a CSE for the marriage certificate and the employer information).
Am not sure why you want to raise a CSE for your employment. Yes, they couldn't see the employer information via a web search does not mean they will fail your eligibility. The key stuff is that your job roles corroborated with the lead statement and main duties. That is what I think.......
Am not sure why you want to raise a CSE for your employment. Yes, they couldn't see the employer information via a web search does not mean they will fail your eligibility. The key stuff is that your job roles corroborated with the lead statement and main duties. That is what I think.......
Yes, that's what I thought too but I don't want them wasting any time on issues like these or having any doubts. I am pretty sure I didn't need to provide any clarifications but that's one of the reasons why I ordered the notes in the first place, to make sure everything is clear to them.
Yes, that's what I thought too but I don't want them wasting any time on issues like these or having any doubts. I am pretty sure I didn't need to provide any clarifications but that's one of the reasons why I ordered the notes in the first place, to make sure everything is clear to them.
Yes, I have. That's what I'm saying. Although, just like you, I am pretty sure I didn't need to provide any clarifications on this matter, I still did just to be 100% sure my application won't be or isn't being delayed for for such a small issue.
I raised CSEs for the marriage certificate and the employment information, just in case.
