5 years ban.

[fishnchip92]

Did you indicate in your application that you were using a representative (submitting form IMM5476)?

Unfortunately many so called consultant operating overseas are not regulated by ICCRC and It is an offense punishable by law to provide Canadian immigration services for a fee or other consideration if not regulated by ICCRC, a Canadian law society, or the Chambre des notaires du Québec. Hence those rep do not indicate that they are being used in the client' application. I reckon the rep used by OP is of the same kind.

 

[Jeevan jyot]

A fraudulent receipt was intentionally/unintentionally submitted with your application. After IRCC send a PFL, another receipt dated MONTHS after you've submitted your application was then submitted, again belonging to someone else. Why were 2 wrong receipts submitted for your application? Do you have the receipt for the application fee for YOUR application at the time of submission?

Did you indicate in your application that you were using a representative (submitting form IMM5476)?
yes I had that receipt or even I have at this time ...

 

[Jeevan jyot]

Which form it is ...I am not aware about this ..
Could you explain please

 

[wonderbly]

Which form it is ...I am not aware about this ..
Could you explain please

Google the form. You should have filled and signed it to give your representative authorisation to apply on your behalf. If you didn't fill that form then IRCC was not informed that someone was applying for you. This makes an already bad case REALLY bad.

Hiring an immigration lawyer now would just be throwing good money after bad IMO. You should just wait for your ban to be over and hope for the best for future applications.

 

[Simba112]

Which form it is ...I am not aware about this ..
Could you explain please

Unless you are gathering evidence against your agent, but the form wont do anything at the moment. It is IMM5476 “Use of Representative form”

 

[fishnchip92]

You should have filled and signed it to give your representative authorisation to apply on your behalf

I don't think the consultant hired was licensed so there was no form filled nor signed. It definitely is an unfortunate situation that has happened . Also to note is there are few licensed consultant operating overseas, so it is hard to find a reliable unlicensed consultant.

Unless you are gathering evidence against your agent, but the form wont do anything at the moment. It is IMM5476 “Use of Representative form”

That is unlikely to happen, as stated in the notes according to officer he/she doesn't see the IMM5476 and hence it is straightforward case to the officer. And most likely this consultant is not licensed so there was no mention of his license number nor his name so this consultant can't be legally held responsible for this mess and hiring an immigration lawyer is of no use because there isn't any evidence to bring him to justice.

 

[Simba112]

I don't think the consultant hired was licensed so there was form filled nor signed. It definitely is an unfortunate situation that has happened . Also to note is there are few licensed consultant operating overseas, so it is hard to find a reliable unlicensed consultant.


That is unlikely to happen, as stated in the notes according to officer he/she doesn't see the IMM5476 and hence it is straightforward case to the officer. And most likely this consultant is not licensed so there was no mention of his license number nor his name so this consultant can't be legally held responsible for this mess and hiring an immigration lawyer is of no use because there isn't any evidence to bring him to justice.

Exactly

 

[Jeevan jyot]

Google the form. You should have filled and signed it to give your representative authorisation to apply on your behalf. If you didn't fill that form then IRCC was not informed that someone was applying for you. This makes an already bad case REALLY bad.

Hiring an immigration lawyer now would just be throwing good money after bad IMO. You should just wait for your ban to be over and hope for the best for future applications.

 

[binu_k]

Won't she be able to prove its a mix up of receipt by agent if she had the actual receipt prior to application date.

Also instead of challanging the decision, can't she ask for leniency and reopening of file. Just a thought.

 

[fishnchip92]

Won't she be able to prove its a mix up of receipt by agent if she had the actual receipt prior to application date.

Also instead of challanging the decision, can't she ask for leniency and reopening of file. Just a thought.

The challenge here is proving that OP hired an representative.

 

[Jeevan jyot]

Won't she be able to prove its a mix up of receipt by agent if she had the actual receipt prior to application date.

Also instead of challanging the decision, can't she ask for leniency and reopening of file. Just a thought.

Firstly I paid the application fee to the consultant when I launched my file after that I paid the second time fee on the 20th may 2019..nd m still thinking why he did so ..like why he added other's receipt with my file ....

 

[Jeevan jyot]

The challenge here is proving that OP hired an representative.

OP means ?

 

[Simba112]

OP means ?

It means you..as a poster

 

[wonderbly]

OP means ?

Original Poster. In this thread, refers to you.

 

[fishnchip92]

OP means ?

Original Poster in other words "You", I apologize if it confused you