>>>>>> 2021 TR to PR Pathway AOR & Timelines <<<<<< Join here

[Alberta2018]

Did you get any email confirmation when you submit webform
One more thing did you get aor? If yes then when

No email confirmation. It was just a green screen at that time.
I haven't got AoR yet, but I have application number by linking successfully to account 2 weeks ago

 

[shravan95]

As I had earlier mentioned that in my past travel history, I have lived in Dubai for almost a year. So I have given all the details regarding my stay in Dubai including a Police Clearance Certificate from Dubai Police.
However in the explanation letter for it I had made a small error. I had travelled there on a paper employment visa (for transit) before I got an actual work permit. In a rush to submit the application instead of writing paper employment visa, I wrote ETA. It was a mistake done which I didn’t even realize.
I have made a new LOE will submit through web form once I get the application number.
Two questions:
Is this a major problem in my application ?
Can it lead to misinterpretation?
Thanks in advance.

 

[Sahil C Patel]

No email confirmation. It was just a green screen at that time.
I haven't got AoR yet, but I have application number by linking successfully to account 2 weeks ago

Could you please tell me how you link your application to to the account ? Please
I don’t know how to get application number!

 

[byqc]

Hello and a bad news.

https://www.bellissimolawgroup.com/inadmissibility/misrepresentation/
https://www.cicnews.com/2021/01/misrepresentation-mistakes-matter-0116963.html#gs.34bqki
http://www.cba.org/cba/cle/pdf/imm13_paper_mccrea.pdf

These say that honest mistake cannot be a reason for not being misrepresentation (basically).
(Actually, I did some web search and found many posts about 5669 6 d., but most of those do not have a post like "I could defend!" despite others' post asking the result.)

I concluded that it is very difficult to fix mistakes like Form 5669 6 d. without a legal pro, and will discuss how many % of similar cases in the past successfully defended and possible withdrawal.
It could be smarter to aim at another program, if withdrawal can avoid resulting in misrepresentation.

 

[ahm756]

Hello and a bad news.

https://www.cicnews.com/2021/01/misrepresentation-mistakes-matter-0116963.html#gs.34bqki

That is when people do not disclose material information that could affect the processing of an application. As the article states, not declaring your past refusals is misrepresentation but if someone tries to rectify it via webform, they will have proof that their mistake was honest and that they tried to fix it.

 

[byqc]

That is when people do not disclose material information that could affect the processing of an application.

6 d. of Form 5669, for which many people made mistakes, is material, See all of websites I posted.
Also, one of applicants failed to defend for her honest mistakes on it.

 

[ahm756]

6 d. of Form 5669, for which many people made mistakes, is material, See all of websites I posted.
Also, one of applicants failed to defend for her honest mistakes on it.

As I said earlier, if someone submits a web form to declare their mistake, the chances of misrepresentation are much lower. Additionally, there will now be proof that they tried to fix their mistake and if an officer sends a PFL, they can use this proof in their explanation.

 

[Tomican]

Hello and a bad news.

https://www.bellissimolawgroup.com/inadmissibility/misrepresentation/
https://www.cicnews.com/2021/01/misrepresentation-mistakes-matter-0116963.html#gs.34bqki
http://www.cba.org/cba/cle/pdf/imm13_paper_mccrea.pdf

These say that honest mistake cannot be a reason for not being misrepresentation (basically).
(Actually, I did some web search and found many posts about 5669 6 d., but most of those do not have a post like "I could defend!" despite others' post asking the result.)

I concluded that it is very difficult to fix mistakes like Form 5669 6 d. without a legal pro, and will discuss how many % of similar cases in the past successfully defended and possible withdrawal.
It could be smarter to aim at another program, if withdrawal can avoid resulting in misrepresentation.

May have to go to lawyer in this matter.

 

[shravan95]

As I had earlier mentioned that in my past travel history, I have lived in Dubai for almost a year. So I have given all the details regarding my stay in Dubai including a Police Clearance Certificate from Dubai Police.
However in the explanation letter for it I had made a small error. I had travelled there on a paper employment visa (for transit) before I got an actual work permit. In a rush to submit the application instead of writing paper employment visa, I wrote ETA. It was a mistake done which I didn’t even realize.
I have made a new LOE will submit through web form once I get the application number.
Two questions:
Is this a major problem in my application ?
Can it lead to misinterpretation?
Thanks in advance.

Anyone any suggestion ?

 

[byqc]

As I said earlier, if someone submits a web form to declare their mistake, the chances of misrepresentation are much lower. Additionally, there will now be proof that they tried to fix their mistake and if an officer sends a PFL, they can use this proof in their explanation.

Thank you for your advice. But there is another reason why I worry so much.
I did not tell this until now because it will make people nervous, but now I dare.

During a live session on May 26 (or so) the chatty lawyer showed a serious face expression when someone asked about its own mistake on 6 d. 5669. The chatty said that it is "simmering" issue.
He said that the applicant should send correction via webform, but the chatty's reaction to the question and words in reply were very different from those in situations when he answered for other questions.
He asked (other) participants to send him a message when he found further legal support would be needed, but he did not do so for the applicant with the 5669 issue, I think. So his serious reaction was not for inducing someone into being his client.

 

[TINTUMINTU]

Hello All,
Did you guys came accross prof of funds requirements for TR to PR application for non essential workers. I didn’t see in the document checklist that they are saying about prof of funds. Please let us know if you guys have submitted your proof of funds. Also please post here if you have links that says proof of funds is required. Thanks

 

[Tomican]

Thank you for your advice. But there is another reason why I worry so much.
I did not tell this until now because it will make people nervous, but now I dare.

During a live session on May 26 (or so) the chatty lawyer showed a serious face expression when someone asked about its own mistake on 6 d. 5669. The chatty said that it is "simmering" issue.
He said that the applicant should send correction via webform, but the chatty's reaction to the question and words in reply were very different from those in situations when he answered for other questions.
He asked (other) participants to send him a message when he found further legal support would be needed, but he did not do so for the applicant with the 5669 issue, I think. So his serious reaction was not for inducing someone into being his client.

I understand how you are worry now. My opinion:
- this forum is only commonsense opinions, there is no legal advice here.
- You have to choose and decide quickly instead of prolonging anxiety: withdraw application, or looking for a lawyer (if you don't have any other option to apply for PR)

 

[ahm756]

Hello All,
Did you guys came accross prof of funds requirements for TR to PR application for non essential workers. I didn’t see in the document checklist that they are saying about prof of funds. Please let us know if you guys have submitted your proof of funds. Also please post here if you have links that says proof of funds is required. Thanks

Not required for any of the streams.

 

[ahm756]

Thank you for your advice. But there is another reason why I worry so much.
I did not tell this until now because it will make people nervous, but now I dare.

During a live session on May 26 (or so) the chatty lawyer showed a serious face expression when someone asked about its own mistake on 6 d. 5669. The chatty said that it is "simmering" issue.
He said that the applicant should send correction via webform, but the chatty's reaction to the question and words in reply were very different from those in situations when he answered for other questions.
He asked (other) participants to send him a message when he found further legal support would be needed, but he did not do so for the applicant with the 5669 issue, I think. So his serious reaction was not for inducing someone into being his client.

If I were you, the first thing I'd do is send a web form as well as get in touch with a lawyer to see what can be done to avoid further issues.

 

[byqc]

I understand how you are worry now. My opinion:
- this forum is only commonsense opinions, there is no legal advice here.
- You have to choose and decide quickly instead of prolonging anxiety: withdraw application, or looking for a lawyer (if you don't have any other option to apply for PR)

Thank you. Last night I sent a message to a law firm. I will discuss the probability of defense first and then decide the next step.
Your replies here really helped me. I think it was you who posted URL of the live session. Also, you gave me an alert that message via webform before getting AoR is nothing. So I thought that my message sent last week could not be a defense and did further research about my issue. And then I found serious facts.
You are really nice and caring person and I appreciate it