1. Based on various notes and typical code they use. Its not security screening. The mention of s16 at top just indicates that page was reviewed before releasing information. And there is nothing redacted from my notes. Hence I just wanted to mention a mere mention of that doesn’t indicate SS.
2. No GCMS notes didn’t push the file in to any action. If that were true then we have many friends on this forum who would have seen action. Its plain luck.
3. As I said there is no change in activities or the analysts comments. Its the same as previous notes. I can post a screenshot later in the evening.
Yes only certain sections are reviewed. A lot of stuff in your notes is your own information. In case there are dependent on application and their signature are not provided for GCMS request they will put s19 on any page which has dependent information.
My guess is someone marks the pages which need to be reviewed and then someone reviews and decides whether to redact information or not.
We are from Jordan, AOR 4 June, ip2 since July 20 according to CBSA notes he is under SS since August. Called IRCC couple of days ago, security check is still in process, eligibility, medical and criminality all passed
We are from Jordan, AOR 4 June, ip2 since July 20 according to CBSA notes he is under SS since August. Called IRCC couple of days ago, security check is still in process, eligibility, medical and criminality all passed
We are from Jordan, AOR 4 June, ip2 since July 20 according to CBSA notes he is under SS since August. Called IRCC couple of days ago, security check is still in process, eligibility, medical and criminality all passed
This is what they were doing to me as well. It's very frustrating when no one replies. You could try emailing Sydney... though they just emailed back to say raise a CSE but I did get my par on the same day.