My understanding is -- If 3/5 comes back . . . You still need to meet the total number of days in Canada of 1,095 - then in order for the "year" to count, you needed to be here for at least 183 days in that year. So if you were only in Canada 183 days every year you would not qualify(?) since you don't have enough total days in that 3/5 period -- I think. But could be wrong.
There is no more 183 days requirement in the new rules. You could, for example have the following days:
year 1: 365 days
year 2: 365 days
year 3: 122 days
year 4: 122 days
year 5: 122 days
That is more than 1095 days and you qualify for citizenship
There is no more 183 days requirement in the new rules. You could, for example have the following days:
year 1: 365 days
year 2: 365 days
year 3: 122 days
year 4: 122 days
year 5: 122 days
That is more than 1095 days and you qualify for citizenship
Totally agree in case of the guy who asked the query..he says he has completed 2 years as of today..so assuming c-6 becomes law tomorrow it would mean the 5 years in consideration are 9th June 2017,16,15,14,13 to 9th June 2012..and he needs to have 1095 days in total with days in years 2014, 2013 & 2012 counted as half upto a max one year..
I've been closely following this Bill, and am pretty frustrated myself. It seems like the Liberals aren't pushing the bill strongly enough fearing the loss of approval from current electorate. That's IMHO.
Now, here's an email reply to my message of support of the bill to my MP:
Dear V@@@@@,
Thank you for writing to me in regards to Bill C-6, which passed the Senate in March and is currently before the House. I welcome hearing from constituents, as open dialogue is a vital part of my role as a Member of Parliament.
Our government encourages all immigrants to take the path to full membership and permanent belonging in Canadian society. One of the strongest pillars for successful integration into Canadian life is achieving Canadian citizenship. Our Bill recognizes the deep attachments which international students and workers often develop with Canada, and allows them to receive credit for time-spent-in-Canada before becoming permanent residents. As an immigrant myself, I am proud to support this Bill.
Bill C-6 also implements our campaign commitment to repeal the worst parts of Stephen Harper's Bill C-24. Our Bill eliminates the government's ability to strip citizenship from dual nationals, a regressive legal tool that created an entire group of second-class citizens. In addition, we repeal other aspects of C-24 which created new barriers to citizenship.
Canada is a nation of immigrants. Our diversity enriches Canadian society, creates global business opportunities, and is part of who we are as Canadians.
Once again, thank you for writing to me about Bill C-6. Please don't hesitate to contact my office on this topic, or any other.
if you really want c6 to pass so do some action on social media, thanks for everyone who is tweeting about c6 and keep fighting for this bill, not like us stressing our self in a small piece of forum
No she didn't say that. She said tomorrow will be C-44 exclusively. She listed bills for next week, including C-6. So "next week" is the best we can get at the moment.