Hello members, I will like you guys to put me through, I just got a mail from IRCC saying Disclosure Package No Intervention.
With a long list of letters and also in a session saying Task Force For Less Complex Claim in yellow color
May 11th 2023 case confirmation
June 17th 1st interview/passport seize
July 7th WP
Sep 14th 2nd interview/brown paper/RDP referral
15th Sep BOC submission to RDP
May 23 2024 ICAC disclosure package sent to IRB ☒ Regular Hearing: Half-Day (3 hours) with no Minster intervention (Disclosure of documents from the Integrated Claim Analysis Centre )
May 11th 2023 case confirmation
June 17th 1st interview/passport seize
July 7th WP
Sep 14th 2nd interview/brown paper/RDP referral
15th Sep BOC submission to RDP
May 23 2024 ICAC disclosure package sent to IRB ☒ Regular Hearing: Half-Day (3 hours) with no Minster intervention (Disclosure of documents from the Integrated Claim Analysis Centre )
Hi, for some reason it dont download the pdf - just loading and than error message. Is this something urgent? Whats the solution for this error? Did you get a chance to download it?
Indeed, I am following the same steps as you, even receiving 1st Disclosure Package-No after a whole year of Background check.
My question, please, it seems that I will wait like you for 4 months until I receive 2nd Disclosure Package-No , especially since they did not ask me to send the evidence. They only told me that I must send the evidence 10 days before the hearing date, but they did not indicate the hearing date in their message, just at tell me what's happened with u now ?
Indeed, I am following the same steps as you, even receiving 1st Disclosure Package-No after a whole year of Background check.
My question, please, it seems that I will wait like you for 4 months until I receive 2nd Disclosure Package-No , especially since they did not ask me to send the evidence. They only told me that I must send the evidence 10 days before the hearing date, but they did not indicate the hearing date in their message, just at tell me what's happened with u now ?
Mine is a bit strange as in the first letter from ICAC it said "decision without hearing", but in the second letter of ICAC it shifted back to a hearing. Don't know why IRB changed it's mind.
Mine is a bit strange as in the first letter from ICAC it said "decision without hearing", but in the second letter of ICAC it shifted back to a hearing. Don't know why IRB changed it's mind.
