We placed a booking so that I can attach further proof of my wedding invitation, also the dates are contingent on visa approval. The only fear of rejection is due to limited funds to show from my mother's end, however, I am assuming that my income as a sponsor, her being in an active job should give some hope of not being rejected. IDK, let's see.
We placed a booking so that I can attach further proof of my wedding invitation, also the dates are contingent on visa approval. The only fear of rejection is due to limited funds to show from my mother's end, however, I am assuming that my income as a sponsor, her being in an active job should give some hope of not being rejected. IDK, let's see.
I am a bit confused now. The amounts listed here https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...isa-temporary-resident-visa.html#incometables means how much one has earned so far while residing in Canada? For example, if someone earns 100K yearly salary job for the last 8 months, but earned let's say 10K in the previous tax year, does that mean that the sponsor doesn't meet LICO?
Please advise with the help of an example if possible.
I am a bit confused now. The amounts listed here https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...isa-temporary-resident-visa.html#incometables means how much one has earned so far while residing in Canada? For example, if someone earns 100K yearly salary job for the last 8 months, but earned let's say 10K in the previous tax year, does that mean that the sponsor doesn't meet LICO?
Please advise with the help of an example if possible.
LICO is based on the amount of money you earned and not salary. NOA is the preferred proof for that reason. Would try to prove the amount you have earned this year from your job via pay stubs, bank records, etc.
LICO is based on the amount of money you earned and not salary. NOA is the preferred proof for that reason. Would try to prove the amount you have earned this year from your job via pay stubs, bank records, etc.
Ok. Referring to the previous example, then in that case, a combination of NOA and paystub needs to be shown as NOA has amount lower than LICO but paystubs have a higher amount.
Ok. Referring to the previous example, then in that case, a combination of NOA and paystub needs to be shown as NOA has amount lower than LICO but paystubs have a higher amount.
