AdUnit Name: [Header ]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250],[970,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Permanent Residency Obligations
AdUnit Name: [ForumThreadViewRightGutter ]
Enabled: [Yes],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[300,250],[300,600]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumThreadViewRightGutter],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Permanent Residency Obligations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser .
AdUnit Name: [AboveMainContent ]
Enabled: [Yes],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[970,250],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Permanent Residency Obligations
Doesn't CBSA have a fair bit of discretion in these scenarios? If so, then it is not fair to say that the officer was not doing his/her job. Perhaps you do not agree with the officer's judgment call here but you can't say that he/she neglected his/her job.
Discretion yes but letting PRs back in without much questioning without being in Canada for over 20 years sometimes allows people to not meet their RO. If everyone knows that there is a good chance the RO won’t be enforced why do we have ROs?
AdUnit Name: [BelowMainContent ]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Permanent Residency Obligations
AdUnit Name: [Footer ]
Enabled: [No],
Viewed On: [Desktop],
Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Permanent Residency Obligations