So, we were rejected because IRCC in Montreal claimed my husband did not have the "requisite" 2 years self-employed experience (in five) needed although the language SPECIFICALLY does not stipulate a self-employed requirement for farmers, only athletes and artists. In short, they "over applied" the law despite the clear language otherwise.
Anybody know anything--Campbell Cohen--on what the likelihood of success on an application for Leave and Judicial Review might be for a farm manager (as specified in the language) with 20 years experience might be, given that the language specifically EXCLUDED farmers from this requirement.
Good day, in one word, do not waste your valuable time in self-employed class nor for appealing a decision made against your interest in that class unless your name is promoted in Google, Wikipedia, news agency or you are a gold medalist, OSCAR & NOBEL winners etc. its more likely a refusal for everyone other than what I said.
So, we were rejected because IRCC in Montreal claimed my husband did not have the "requisite" 2 years self-employed experience (in five) needed although the language SPECIFICALLY does not stipulate a self-employed requirement for farmers, only athletes and artists. In short, they "over applied" the law despite the clear language otherwise.
Anybody know anything--Campbell Cohen--on what the likelihood of success on an application for Leave and Judicial Review might be for a farm manager (as specified in the language) with 20 years experience might be, given that the language specifically EXCLUDED farmers from this requirement.
So, we were rejected because IRCC in Montreal claimed my husband did not have the "requisite" 2 years self-employed experience (in five) needed although the language SPECIFICALLY does not stipulate a self-employed requirement for farmers, only athletes and artists. In short, they "over applied" the law despite the clear language otherwise.
Anybody know anything--Campbell Cohen--on what the likelihood of success on an application for Leave and Judicial Review might be for a farm manager (as specified in the language) with 20 years experience might be, given that the language specifically EXCLUDED farmers from this requirement.
So sorry to hear this. Considering the 20 years experience your husband has it
might be a good idea to apply for review of the decision through a solid lawyer.
No, farmers are excluded from the self-employment requirement--IRCC attorney acknowledged this when they offered a settlement based on the language of the law. I suspect many folks were inappropriately refused because of the stream, but it doesn't matter now that the stream is closed. Never underestimate the value of smart attorneys. ;-)
Hello
I'm sorry to disturb
I have your previous problem right now
My JR application has been accepted and I am waiting for another officer's review.
Can you please tell me what steps you went through after the success of JR
Thankful
