That's exactly what I said before, instead of spending your time (and others) on non-profit discussion,why don't you stop it and keep supporting others with the information?
To be honest guys, when I created my account on this forum for the first time and saw some members have over 1000 posts, I was thinking they have got pool of knowledge and useful information, BUT now I started thinking this is really waste of time to read such dialogue and the 1000 and over posts can be easily collected from posting such conversation :-(
That's exactly what I said before, instead of spending your time (and others) on non-profit discussion,why don't you stop it and keep supporting others with the information?
To be honest guys, when I created my account on this forum for the first time and saw some members have over 1000 posts, I was thinking they have got pool of knowledge and useful information, BUT now I started thinking this is really waste of time to read such dialogue and the 1000 and over posts can be easily collected from posting such conversation :-(
Well I am trying my hardest to stay "on topic" here - speaking of which:
Mr Nectar, please once again I will ask you to answer my question:
Where do you arrive at the figure 3,500 post-June-26 applications at CHC London, when the total worldwide, split across 44 visa offices, is less than 10,000?
I am aware of some grammarians who still consider it unacceptable to start a sentence with and, but or because.
In their opinion, doing so creates a sentence fragment, not a complete sentence.
I would like to see where first person singular personal pronouns have been banned from the start of a sentence.
I have looked through my old copy of Strunk and White, but I cannot find a reference.
Can you quote the reference for this?