+1(514) 937-9445 or Toll-free (Canada & US) +1 (888) 947-9445
AdUnit Name: [Header]
Enabled: [No],   Viewed On: [Desktop],   Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250],[970,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship
AdUnit Name: [ForumThreadViewRightGutter]
Enabled: [Yes],   Viewed On: [Desktop],   Dimensions: [[300,250],[300,600]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumThreadViewRightGutter],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship
AdUnit Name: [AboveMainContent]
Enabled: [Yes],   Viewed On: [Desktop],   Dimensions: [[728,90],[970,250],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship

simoncanada

Hero Member
Dec 3, 2015
297
13
Hi all i would be eligible for citizenship next year middle

so my question is there any chance : Can 3 years citizenship rule back by 2017.


i am confused about this immigration minister, first he says by July 1 2016, then he says end of this year.

so guys any idea ??
 
simoncanada said:
Hi all i would be eligible for citizenship next year middle

so my question is there any chance : Can 3 years citizenship rule back by 2017.


i am confused about this immigration minister, first he says by July 1 2016, then he says end of this year.

so guys any idea ??
if the minister himself doesn't even know, what makes you think anybody here would have an idea?
 
simoncanada said:
Hi all i would be eligible for citizenship next year middle

so my question is there any chance : Can 3 years citizenship rule back by 2017.


i am confused about this immigration minister, first he says by July 1 2016, then he says end of this year.

so guys any idea ??
Since the folks on here know more than the Minister of Immigration, then I suppose ...
 
marcher said:
Since the folks on here know more than the Minister of Immigration, then I suppose ...

+1
 
simoncanada said:
so there is no chance to come back 3 years rule by next year

No one has no clue including the Minister himself.
 
simoncanada said:
i agree the minister is just for misinformation
No, what I am saying is no one knows at this stage. It is possible, I would say highly unlikely, because even if the bill receives Royal assent before the end of 2016; which is probably not going to happen since it is at the verge of being amended and sent back to House of Commons, then it will need time before it can be implemented, approximately a year.
 
marcher said:
No, what I am saying is no one knows at this stage. It is possible, I would say highly unlikely, because even if the bill receives Royal assent before the end of 2016; which is probably not going to happen since it is at the verge of being amended and sent back to House of Commons, then it will need time before it can be implemented, approximately a year.

And like Marcher says, this is just his guess too, it could end up being approved by year end and put in place quickly as it is reverting to an older policy for the 3/5 rules but Marcher's supposition is at least as likely. At this point it is a pure guessing game that will lead to nothing good so all you can do is wait.
 
Naheulbeuck said:
And like Marcher says, this is just his guess too, it could end up being approved by year end and put in place quickly as it is reverting to an older policy for the 3/5 rules but Marcher's supposition is at least as likely. At this point it is a pure guessing game that will lead to nothing good so all you can do is wait.
True it is a guessing game, but one could make educated guesses based on precedents and reason. It does not make sense that they could easily revert to the old policy because it was in place before due to the different circumstances around it. The sudden increase of applications would be beyond capacity. In addition, the processing of applications is different since it does not go through three stages like before. In addition, the sensibility of the topic requires close scrutiny and assurance of the tools and methods used. Granting citizenship is a big decision, and the officials have to ensure no errors are committed before approving the application.
 
marcher said:
True it is a guessing game, but one could make educated guesses based on precedents and reason. It does not make sense that they could easily revert to the old policy because it was in place before due to the different circumstances around it. The sudden increase of applications would be beyond capacity. In addition, the processing of applications is different since it does not go through three stages like before. In addition, the sensibility of the topic requires close scrutiny and assurance of the tools and methods used. Granting citizenship is a big decision, and the officials have to ensure no errors are committed before approving the application.

If it is so hard to then why keep on telling this time that will be 3ys rule will pass
 
Hamid khan said:
If it is so hard to then why keep on telling this time that will be 3ys rule will pass
Those "they" are not the same "they" who make the decision
 
AdUnit Name: [BelowMainContent]
Enabled: [No],   Viewed On: [Desktop],   Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship
AdUnit Name: [Footer]
Enabled: [No],   Viewed On: [Desktop],   Dimensions: [[728,90],[300,250]]
CampaignId: [/22646143967/candadavisa/ForumHeaderGeneric],
forumSection: Settlement in Canada, subForumSection: Citizenship