Parents and Grandparents Sponsorship 2019

[alpachinko]

If one parent is deemed inadmissible then BOTH parents will be rejected.

https://www.canada.ca/en/immigratio...ses/family-class-decisions/admissibility.html

Do u know what kind of disease.my mom has diabetes and hyperthyroidism that she takes medication.

 

[Thamely]

Hi Guys, please some advice

I dont know if I should use forms :
IMM5669 with date of 06-2019 or 11-2018, both are available.
and
IMM008 02-2019 or 11-2018

Thank you

 

[spr2425]

In the Financial evaluation form if I choose NO as an option for statement of consent, do I still need to sign and provide the SIN # ? Please advice

 

[nayr69sg]

Do u know what kind of disease.my mom has diabetes and hyperthyroidism that she takes medication.

DM and Hyperthyroidism is NOT on the list of inadmissable conditions.

They are looking for conditions that take up a lot more resources. Eg Renal failure on dialysis.

Rare conditions that require drugs that cost a bomb.

Multiple sclerosis. Cancer that has not been treated and not in remission.

Stuff like that. So your mom is fine. Don't worry.

 

[nayr69sg]

In the Financial evaluation form if I choose NO as an option for statement of consent, do I still need to sign and provide the SIN # ? Please advice

My advice to you : No you do not need to.

That is what I would advise you.

 

[bdidol]

Hi guys. One quick help. In sch A background. Is it mandatory to write the “name” by hand!?

I typed it in the box and my parents signed it.

Appreciate if any one can quickly confirm.

It is mandatory to sign by hand, according to the doc cheklist. Logic says you dont need typing your name in that case.

 

[#EEC]

Hi guys. One quick help. In sch A background. Is it mandatory to write the “name” by hand!?

I typed it in the box and my parents signed it.

Appreciate if any one can quickly confirm.

If u typed name n signed by hand than its acceptable... I missed signs by hand... Now waiting for application to be returned... But I would say form is quite misleading as it says"by typing name u r signing electronically " And now they r not accepting it...

 

[nguyentu2001]

I am sponsoring my mom from UK. I retained a lawyer as we have a couple of issues. Thank you to this wonderful forum and its members , I found out about updated forms just before my lawyer sent them. So there was a discussion to send updated forms or the old version and here is a comment from my lawyer’s office- do submit updated versions of the application documents as IRCC will return the package as incomplete. Now we are in a rush to update them and My mom , me and my co-signer again have to sign them. It is a bad play from IRCC and what my lawyer’s office thinks is that how they are going to eliminate this extra number of applications that they allowed (26,000+ instead of 20,000) . So my advice , if you haven’t submitted the application yet, update docs before you submit it, otherwise there is a high chance for them to be returned as incomplete. I know there was a twitter post by IRCC saying otherwise but there is a history of them being wrong, don’t take a chance a submit updated versions.
Good luck all

which updated forms you are referring to?
I started filling out application after invitation sent at that time forms were updated. Did you notice another update later on? Did your lawyer fill out forms prior to receiving invitation?

 

[bdidol]

In the Financial evaluation form if I choose NO as an option for statement of consent, do I still need to sign and provide the SIN # ? Please advice

No. The sin# and sign is only when you mark yes

 

[danny_scars]

If u typed name n signed by hand than its acceptable... I missed signs by hand... Now waiting for application to be returned... But I would say form is quite misleading as it says"by typing name u r signing electronically " And now they r not accepting it...

the form is not misleading, u just didn't read the instructions on the checklist.

 

[danny_scars]

It is mandatory to sign by hand, according to the doc cheklist. Logic says you dont need typing your name in that case.

form won't validate unless u type something in that box. how to go around it? type and hand sign it..
it's not rocket science

 

[nayr69sg]

form won't validate unless u type something in that box. how to go around it? type and hand sign it..
it's not rocket science

you can type name in and then hand sign beside.

 

[bdidol]

I am sponsoring my mom from UK. I retained a lawyer as we have a couple of issues. Thank you to this wonderful forum and its members , I found out about updated forms just before my lawyer sent them. So there was a discussion to send updated forms or the old version and here is a comment from my lawyer’s office- do submit updated versions of the application documents as IRCC will return the package as incomplete. Now we are in a rush to update them and My mom , me and my co-signer again have to sign them. It is a bad play from IRCC and what my lawyer’s office thinks is that how they are going to eliminate this extra number of applications that they allowed (26,000+ instead of 20,000) . So my advice , if you haven’t submitted the application yet, update docs before you submit it, otherwise there is a high chance for them to be returned as incomplete. I know there was a twitter post by IRCC saying otherwise but there is a history of them being wrong, don’t take a chance a submit updated versions.
Good luck all

Why do you need a lawyer?

If you signed and sent the before June 1st, there is no way they will be returned.

The chages in the forms are across all Federal organizations to add more gender options only as far I know and not related to CIC only. The changes came in effect from Jun 1

 

[danny_scars]

you can type name in and then hand sign beside.

yep.. that is exactly what i just said.

 

[bdidol]

form won't validate unless u type something in that box. how to go around it? type and hand sign it..
it's not rocket science

I validated and removed the name before printing. I dont see a point of sign electrocally and again by hand