AOR 11 June
Ip1/MEP 27 June
Ip2 9 October (First application update)
Just now I was going through my application portal and there was a second update. Wonder what is could be! Anyone has any idea??
%age statuses by month as per Immitracker. Based on my past experience on reaction to this post will start with following disclaimer points
Yes the immitracker data may not be accurate, as not all people enter or update their data. But I think it is okay as in no field you can have absolute population data. You will have to work with sample data and make decisions.
As you read this and the data and you feel "oh I could list N reasons the data is not the right sample" … well yeah I know that BUT unless someone can give better data, this is all we have. So let’s make peace with it.
Immitracker ignores inactive cases. And yes it does impact %ages. However, I think immitracker is correct in ignoring inactive cases.
I stand corrected on above. On 9th October there were a lot of cases which went inactive and hence were messing up the %age trends. I was not tracking active cases on regular basis as the numbers didn't change much. But to keep consistency I have now used active case number as on 21st Sep (as that is the only week I had captured number of active cases)
Having said all of above, I think this data can still be used to see trends which are useful. The %ages may not be accurate but overall movement is definitely indicative of progress
As per my GCMS notes, my application was sent to CPC-Vegreville for case analyst review. They did process certain PR applications as given in below news..
AOR 11 June
Ip1/MEP 27 June
Ip2 9 October (First application update)
Just now I was going through my application portal and there was a second update. Wonder what is could be! Anyone has any idea??
%age statuses by month as per Immitracker. Based on my past experience on reaction to this post will start with following disclaimer points
Yes the immitracker data may not be accurate, as not all people enter or update their data. But I think it is okay as in no field you can have absolute population data. You will have to work with sample data and make decisions.
As you read this and the data and you feel "oh I could list N reasons the data is not the right sample" … well yeah I know that BUT unless someone can give better data, this is all we have. So let’s make peace with it.
Immitracker ignores inactive cases. And yes it does impact %ages. However, I think immitracker is correct in ignoring inactive cases.
I stand corrected on above. On 9th October there were a lot of cases which went inactive and hence were messing up the %age trends. I was not tracking active cases on regular basis as the numbers didn't change much. But to keep consistency I have now used active case number as on 21st Sep (as that is the only week I had captured number of active cases)
Having said all of above, I think this data can still be used to see trends which are useful. The %ages may not be accurate but overall movement is definitely indicative of progress
%age statuses by month as per Immitracker. Based on my past experience on reaction to this post will start with following disclaimer points
Yes the immitracker data may not be accurate, as not all people enter or update their data. But I think it is okay as in no field you can have absolute population data. You will have to work with sample data and make decisions.
As you read this and the data and you feel "oh I could list N reasons the data is not the right sample" … well yeah I know that BUT unless someone can give better data, this is all we have. So let’s make peace with it.
Immitracker ignores inactive cases. And yes it does impact %ages. However, I think immitracker is correct in ignoring inactive cases.
I stand corrected on above. On 9th October there were a lot of cases which went inactive and hence were messing up the %age trends. I was not tracking active cases on regular basis as the numbers didn't change much. But to keep consistency I have now used active case number as on 21st Sep (as that is the only week I had captured number of active cases)
Having said all of above, I think this data can still be used to see trends which are useful. The %ages may not be accurate but overall movement is definitely indicative of progress
As per my GCMS notes, my application was sent to CPC-Vegreville for case analyst review. They did process certain PR applications as given in below news..
Yeah, it said Eligibility reviewed required because of proof of fund.
Although I don't think it's gonna be a big issue, it takes months for a officer review my case these days.
Aor 2 june 2018
Medical passed 14 june 2018
No update after
Anyone with same timeline.
If more then five people are waiting with same timeline of first week of june, that means its normal. Please reply
To all who have been waiting long and not had any updates. I know someone who had a similar situation and the file didn't move at all from IP1 stage, yesterday he received a COPR. So there is some movement going on and hopefully next 2 weeks will clear out a lot of outstanding cases. Happy Weekend all.
fingers crossed
