Yesterday, I finally received the PPR. These are my times:
CEC Inland
AOR - Mar 19
Med passed- April 15
RCMP requested - June 4
RCMP submitted - June 9
PPR - August 1
It was a long wait and I was starting to think I did something wrong with the application, but finally I received the PPR. It is stressful but keep the faith. As a friend told me, no bad news are usually good news.
Yesterday, I finally received the PPR. These are my times:
CEC Inland
AOR - Mar 19
Med passed- April 15
RCMP requested - June 4
RCMP submitted - June 9
PPR - August 1
It was a long wait and I was starting to think I did something wrong with the application, but finally I received the PPR. It is stressful but keep the faith. As a friend told me, no bad news are usually good news.
I ordered GCMS notes by myself, there was a question if I am ordering it on my behalf and I answered yes but I have not attached any consent form at all.
I ordered GCMS notes by myself, there was a question if I am ordering it on my behalf and I answered yes but I have not attached any consent form at all.
14-March AOR on tracker has been unchanged for so long. Not sure whether its people who don't care to update or is it CIC which has stopped working on our files?
14-March AOR on tracker has been unchanged for so long. Not sure whether its people who don't care to update or is it CIC which has stopped working on our files?
14-March AOR on tracker has been unchanged for so long. Not sure whether its people who don't care to update or is it CIC which has stopped working on our files?
We are trying to interpret the GCMS notes of my Friend with AOR 01/04/2017
As per notes medical and criminality is passed. Eligibility : Not Started
On 13/07/2017 the Agent reviewed A11.2 and marked as MET with details to back his decision.
Also on 13/07/2017 under one of the eligibility sub section the same agent updated Eligibity new value to : MET.
On 14/07/2017 the file transferred to NDVO and the reason : Work Load Redistribution and on same date there is another Eligibity sub section which mention Old Value : Met , New Value : Not Started. This was updated by a different agent at CIO Sydney.
What you guys think the scenario is as per the notes?